Calvinism is Not the Gospel

Download PDF

Calvinism is Not the Gospel

Calvinism is a self-defeating, incoherent, slippery doctrine that has privily made its way into the church. Its proponents are men of renown (at least in Christendom) who are revered as being champions and heralds of truth when, in reality, they are nothing more than closet devil worshipers. They are peddling a poisonous doctrine that is almost as subtle as the devil himself, and they take pride in their administration of this poison to the sheep. I am astonished at how almost every well-known and respected “Pastor,” especially on social media, is a Calvinist. You wouldn’t know this by taking a cursory look at their sermons\talks, because a lot of times they use carefully crafted rhetoric to disguise their position. In fact, it almost seems as though these men intentionally hide their Calvinistic inclinations until after they’ve lured you in with bits of the truth, and then they beguile you with their obtuse wordsmithing. Even so, it doesn’t take a trained eye to easily spot where their Calvinistic doctrine bleeds through to their messages. In this Chapter, I will eviscerate this doctrine of devils and set at liberty those that have been ensnared by this damnable heresy.

Calvinism is a false doctrine that centers around the writings of a man named John Calvin. John Calvin was a man, who wished he could have played a part in the reformation that sprung out of the Catholic Church. Instead, he ran Martin Luther’s protest into the ground. He also fabricated a false gospel to damn the simple. He also took pleasure in the burning of Michael Servetus at the stake, because of a minor dispute they had over the nature of the trinity. John Calvin is, ironically, burning in Hell right now. 

This idiot left for us his so-called “wise counsel” in the form of multiple books. One of which is called The Institutes of the Christian Religion, a text that has more pages in it than the Bible itself.

This fact alone should raise a red flag.

Before I go on, I will make plain what the gospel actually is, so that you can clearly see the difference between lies and the truth.

1 John 5 9-13

9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.

10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.

11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.

12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God

So, the whole record of God is that if anyone believes on Jesus Christ, he is saved and has eternal life. If you believe this, then you are saved. If you do not believe this, then you are calling God a liar. Please note this to be the official “record” of God. This is what God would like you to know, as a result of reading the scriptures.

Now Calvinists would say that they believe these things, but this is completely untrue and I will explain why below. Do not be fooled, they are double talkers, and they like to slither out of any accusation. Like the greased up deaf dude from Family Guy.

Romans 3

4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

Calvinism is a weird cult that claims to believe in the “sovereignty” of God. Which is a stupid façade of false piety. What they really mean by “sovereignty” is meticulous control. They say that God ordains everything that comes to pass, including sins. They believe that attributing a fastidious, exacting control over the Earth gives God glory. This is so patently false and backwards, that I am aghast at the droves of otherwise intelligent people that hold to this heresy. Listen, God is so above and beyond us, that whether He has control over every event in the world or not, is nothing to Him. It’s all less than a drop in a bucket to God. Claiming that God ordains everything, does nothing to honor God’s majesty. In fact, believing this doctrine results in attributing sins to the hand of God. It makes God the author of evil. And that is why I say Calvinism is a sick cult; because they know it’s evil, but they cling to it anyways. The dictionary defines a “cult” as a group of people that have “a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing.” Calvinists have a misplaced and excessive admiration for the devil, who masquerades as God. “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works” (2 Corinthians 11 14-15).

Not only that, but God does not painstakingly determine all events in the world. God only determines those things that are needful, to guarantee the greatest number of people to believe on Him. He endures “with much longsuffering” the evils that transpire in this world, because He is “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).

This is so common sensical, that I am blindsided by the monstrous pervasiveness of Calvinism. It is an epidemic. Most of the so-called “scholarly” churches that tout the Bible as supreme are Calvinistic. And these pricks lord over you with their false exegesis; they leverage Biblical authority to make you submit to their satanic idol god. And their god is satan. Because God is not in control of the sins of this world, satan is. In fact, the Bible says that satan is the “ruler of this world” (John 12:31) and that he is the “god of this world.” In fact, 2 Corinthians was written about the Calvinist, “In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them” (2 Corinthians 4:4). Satan is called the god of this world because he desires to control you, and everything else in this world. Calvinists do the same, in an effort to ascribe more capabilities to their limited god. This is foolish, God is so omnipotent, that He can allow his creatures freewill. That is who God is. He is not like a man who has to create pre-programmed robots.

Under Calvinism, God picks and chooses some people for Heaven, and sends the rest to Hell, for no reason. This is absolutely retarded. This has to be the peak of reprobation. Calvinism “changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man” (Romans 1:23). I swear, there isn’t a single verse that the Calvinist believes on face value. Every single passage in the Bible is twisted by them in the Greek. They do not even believe John 3:16! They think “world” means elect! And “whosoever” means elect! It’s so mind boggling. Calvinists are going to be surprised when they are put in Hell.

Calvinism is a doctrine that they like to summarize as 5 points, acronymized by the word TULIP. Yes, the flower tulip, as though dressing up their sick doctrine with the soft image of a flower would make the acceptance of their message any more likely. A very foolish and earthly tactic, especially for those that claim to rely solely on the “sovereignty” of God for the deliverance of the gospel.

This fleshly strategy is further demonstrated by how they’ve sugar-coated the name of their religion through time. It used to be called “Calvinism.” But even Calvinists know that 1 Corinthians 3:4 exposes the carnality of calling yourself after another man’s name. And so, it later became “Reformed Theology.” This is a bit less offensive, in that the name emphasizes the church’s separation from the heresies of Rome. Even though most Calvinists prefer this title today, it has been changed yet again. Maybe it’s because Lutherans have taken offense to how Calvinism had hi-jacked the Protestant Reformation. When it was Luther (and not Calvin) that had initiated the protest to begin with. And because Calvinists are not satisfied with hi-jacking the works of a man, they set their eyes on robbing God of his truth by calling their theology “the doctrines of grace.” As if their religion is the only branch of Christianity that is a beacon of grace, which couldn’t be further from the truth.

I am going to present each point of their doctrine TULIP, and I will immediately refute each point with scripture. Then, I will most likely conclude this chapter with a short rant on how reprobated and disingenuous hyper Calvinists are.

T. Total Depravity

This first point is something that you are likely to agree with, that man is totally depraved. We all know that people are inherently sinful and that nobody is perfect, of course. But that is not what Calvinists mean by “total depravity,” though they are happy to pander to your initial false impression for a season… in hopes of further indoctrinating you.

What they really mean by “total depravity” is “total inability”; which is to say that man is incapable of doing anything good, including believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. That man is so depraved, he cannot, of his own freewill, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved.

They like to use the illustration of a dead body, a literal cadaver. They cite Ephesians 2:1, stating that we are so dead, that we cannot respond to God. That God has to enable us to believe on him, otherwise no man could ever believe on Jesus Christ. Ironically, when you talk with different individual Calvinists on this point, their programming compels them all to present the same defense, with the same verbiage, with almost identical inflection points in the articulation of their speech:

“Can a dead body believe?!!”, they say.

What’s funny is how contrived, weak, and question begging this response really is. I question whether Calvinists even believe what they are parroting.

In any case, yes, man is spiritually dead by default. By this, the Bible says that we cannot please God without first believing the gospel. It does not mean that man is incapable of believing the gospel, which is what Calvinism espouses.

In Hebrews 11:6, notice how God is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him: “But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.” This implies that they are not yet rewarded, until after they diligently seek him. If God has to enable you to “diligently seek him,” then he has already rewarded you with the ability to seek him. This is clearly a twisted interpretation of this passage, yet this is how Calvinists read all such passages in scripture.

And if you look at Ephesians Chapter 1, in context. It says:

11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.

13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,

14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.

It says that “we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.” Note that it also says, “in whom ye also trusted, AFTER that ye heard the word of truth.” So, a “dead” person can, in fact, trust on God by first hearing the word of truth: the gospel of his salvation. It then follows that the promise of “being predestinated to the praise of his glory” happens as a result of that belief.

This is the gospel: that you are guaranteed Heaven by first believing on the Lord Jesus Christ.

This correct gospel is presented the same way in practice, as demonstrated in Acts 16, when the Philippian Jailer (unsaved) asked Paul:

Jailer: “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”

Paul responded: “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.”

Paul didn’t respond with a bunch of buffoonery like: “You cannot do anything to be saved… Can a dead body believe?!!”

Nor did Paul do a bait-and-switch by telling the jailer that all he had to do is believe, all the while knowing in the back of his mind that a dead man cannot believe. Only a Calvinist would do something as doubleminded as that.

In the book of Romans, Paul juxtaposes works against grace through faith. Stating that they are not the same thing. Even if you were as dead as a cadaver, and cannot do any good whatsoever, it still remains that you can believe. Because faith is not a meritorious “good work” as some Calvinists would like you to think. Instead, it is just an exercise of discretion, a mental assent.

Romans 11

5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.

6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

And let’s not forget Ephesians 2:8-9. Salvation is the gift of God. It is made efficacious by faith.

Besides all this, common sense tells you that faith is not meritorious. Imagine a person that is utterly depraved, self-centered, psychopathic, and even God-hating. And this person only does what’s in their best interest, without regard for morality or the well-being of anyone else. If that person is persuaded that God is real, and that an eternal Hell awaits them for their sins; And they realize that Jesus took the penalty for all sins; And that all that is required of them is to believe on Jesus Christ; It then logically follows that it’s in their best interest to believe on Jesus Christ and be saved.

Even if that person continues as they were, in their manner of life and hatred towards all that is called good. If they believe on Jesus Christ, then they can be saved from the penalty of their sins. Where is the good works in this? There are no good works to speak of. This is nothing more than acknowledging the truth. Once again, this is the gospel.

Romans 3

27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By one of works? No, on the contrary, by a law of faith.

Calvinists (and most Christian denominations) portray faith in Christ as if it were some kind of morally good action: That only good men believe on God, or that it requires moral excellence to believe on Christ. This is not what is written in scripture:

1 John

9 In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.

10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.

God first loved us. This is displayed on the cross. And because of that, we believe on him for salvation.

And finally, to quote God Himself on the matter, Jesus Christ is of the opinion that a “dead man” can believe and be saved. Hear the words that came out of his own mouth:

John 11

25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:

26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

27 She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.

Therefore, we conclude that all men are utterly depraved. And so, God chooses to save anyone who wants to be saved.

And let’s take a step back and just look at the big picture. Heaven is a perfect place, you must be perfect to enter therein. This excludes everyone, because nobody is perfect. Therefore, God lowered the bar all the way to the dirt of the ground.

The spirit behind the cross, in doing all of this, is to enable anyone to come in. It’s by faith, to make it easy to come in. Otherwise, what’s the point of making it by faith, if it is impossible for man to have faith? It defeats the whole purpose of the cross. It defeats the whole purpose of doing away with the law.

If it is impossible to believe, you might as well say that you have to keep the whole law perfectly. Because, according to Calvinists, it’s impossible for man to have faith; just as impossible as it is for man to keep the law. You have nullified grace by making faith an impossibility.

Therefore, “total depravity” is a completely useless, vain, and self-defeating doctrine that nullifies God’s work on the cross, and calls God a liar. It is pure antichrist garbage, straight out of the pits of Hell. It also makes a mockery of God, and the entire narrative of the Bible is just an inconsequential, point-less, predetermined play. Nothing really has any significance, it’s just a bunch of meaningless puppetry. Even the actions that God takes are void of meaning or significance. Look at the following discourse on how Calvinism renders the teaching of the Bible, assuming that Calvin’s conception of God is accurate:

Calvin’s god says: “let me do away with the law.”

Normal people ask: “for what reason?”

Calvinist answer: “We may never know…it’s for his glory…”

Then Calvin’s god says: “it’s by faith, it’s by faith!”

Normal people ask: “Why? If it’s impossible for man to have faith?”

Calvinist answer: “We may never know…it’s for his glory…”

And then Calvin’s god picks some and not others to have faith.

Normal people ask: “Why?”

Calvinist answer, “We may never know…it’s for his glory…”

You get the picture, they nullify the entire Bible with their antichrist garbage. I spit on them.

In Jesus name, amen.

U. Unconditional Election

Unconditional election alleges that God unconditionally and unchangeably selects some people from the beginning of time to be saved, and not others. God picks some and not others. “Not others,” is a euphemism for saying that God predetermines the rest to Hell. It has nothing to do with works because Romans 11:6, Ephesians 2:8-9, John 3, and Galatians (pretty much the entire Bible) forbids that any man could be justified by works in the sight of God. Which is true, but Calvinists seem to think that faith is a work. Therefore, Calvin thinks that no one is able to believe in God to be saved. Hyper-Calvinists would go so far as to claim that God would doom babies to Hell from the womb, and cite Romans 9:11 as proof text for this.

So, this unconditional election stands on the shoulders of the previous point in “T” in TULIP (Total depravity).

In the words of Calvinists, they say:

“Because of humanity’s total depravity, God of necessity, in eternity past, chose certain people to be saved. There was nothing inherently better or different about the chosen people which caused God to choose them. God was totally free in His decision to show grace and mercy to some sinners who deserved nothing but His wrath. This is, in essence, the doctrine of Unconditional Election” (

Remember, total depravity is actually defined as: incapable of believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. That is the true meaning of that word, as understood by Calvinists. But they do not plainly lay this out, when they go off to present and teach their doctrine. This is to evade the implications of their doctrine long enough to plant seeds of Calvin in your mind. So, in truth, that first line reads:

“Because no one is capable of believing on Christ, God, from eternity past, has to unilaterally force some to believe”

But as established earlier, “total inability” is a false doctrine. And if man is capable of believing on Christ, then it is not “of necessity that God, in eternity past, chose certain to be saved.” Thus, the logical necessity that Calvinists try to establish is completely undone, as their premise of “total depravity” is unfounded.

On to the next line:

“There was nothing inherently better or different about the chosen people which caused God to choose them”

This is complete denial of the truth of scripture. This is false piety, false humility. There is a difference between the saved and the unsaved. Faith is the difference. Faith is the condition of salvation. Just as it is written in the old testament, God told his people that he would pass over them, provided they mark their door posts with blood.

Exodus 12

7 And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt.

God’s statement wasn’t: “I will pass over some of you, for no reason known unto, for I have ordained it from the foundation of the world. There is nothing that you can do, for I will smite whom I will smite.”

No. He said to put the blood over the door posts. If you do not put the blood over the door posts, he will not pass over you. Even if you are a Jew, Egyptian, man, or beast. That was the requirement. That is what God sees: He is looking for the blood on the door post. The blood on the door post in Egypt is a metaphor of the blood on the cross. God is looking for faith: faith in Jesus Christ and his shed blood on the cross.

Hebrews 11

1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. 2For by it the elders obtained a good report.

28 Through faith he kept the passover, and the sprinkling of blood, lest he that destroyed the firstborn should touch them.

John 3

36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

Faith in the finished work of the cross is the difference that is required for salvation. And anyone can believe on Jesus Christ. That is the difference between those that are saved and those that are unsaved. The unsaved have never believed on the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation.

Still, Calvinists maintain that they were enabled by God to believe. And that faith is the vehicle through which God unconditionally elects them. And when asked why God chose them, rather than others, many Calvinists say:

“I have no idea why God picked me, but I am sure glad he did!”  (When they make this statement, programming dictates that they accompany this defense with a glazed look on their face…. with a hint of admiration… staring off into the distance… their minds fixed on Calvin.)

This mentality is thoroughly asinine, to the point that it calls God a liar. God does not unconditionally save some and not others. Election is conditional. It is granted on the condition that a man believes on Jesus Christ. By stating that faith is the means by which God elects some and not others, that all men are incapable of believing by default; and so, God must unilaterally elect some to believe, undermines the very meaning of the word believe. Because faith, as defined in the Bible, is an act of the will, to believe something.

Revelation 22

17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

John 3

14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”

The Bible says that “God is no respecter of persons”(Acts 10:34). Therefore, he cannot arbitrarily pick some and not others, based on no differentiating condition. Besides, it is clearly written that faith is the condition of salvation. And once Christ is crucified, he would draw all men unto himself.

John 12

22 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.

1 Corinthians 15

22 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

Romans 5

1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:

2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.

7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

17 For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

So, you have to receive the abundance of grace in order to receive Christ’s righteousness as your own. How do you receive the abundance of grace? You guessed it, by believing on the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation.

Next line in the Calvinist statement of unconditional election:

“God was totally free in His decision to show grace and mercy to some sinners who deserved nothing but His wrath.”

This last point is really a Pandora’s box. There are many assumptions that are made in this comment that are not adequately addressed in all 1200 pages of Calvin’s Institutes. Calvin assumes a nature of time, free will, God’s sovereignty; all of which are up to subjective interpretation. You would think that in such a big book, that he would at least try to address these assumptions with clarity. But he does not, and truly cannot. It is embarrassing, just as the parable of the house builder:

Luke 6

46 And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?

47 Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like:

48 He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock.

49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

Calvinists love to scream out the words: “Sovereign,” “Sovereign!” They love to say that God is a sovereign lord, just as the parable in Matthew says. They call him Lord, Lord, but they do not do the things that He says. And what does God ask us to do?

John 14

11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake.

But they do not. In fact, they refuse to believe on God. They refuse to believe that whosoever believes in Jesus Christ shall be saved. Instead, they’ve confounded the word in their own reprobate minds. They claim that man cannot believe on God, even though God asks that they do believe on him (which obviously implies that they can). Otherwise, they envision God playing out some cosmic version of marionettes, like a child in a sandbox. And not only does God do things in vain, but he says things in vain. They are mocking God and calling him a liar.

Galatians 6

7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.

And what must you sow? Or what does it mean to “sow to the Spirit,” if you intend on reaping everlasting life?

Galatians 2

16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Believe in Jesus Christ. This is the sowing that is required in order to reap eternal life.

Calvinists attribute their belief as being the predetermined enablement from God. And that they, of themselves, cannot believe God. This is heresy, and mocks God. You see, YOU need to sow, in order for YOU to reap.

But Calvinists refuse to do this. Instead, they prefer to sow to their flesh. They would much rather take up the writings of a man to disannul the 1 thing that God requires of man. And for what hope? Why do they do these things? It’s because they would like prance around in their fleshly mind, as though they were some kind of elite breed of Christian. That they are master logicians and exercise their heightened intelligence to find out the deep things of God. This is sowing to the flesh.

Job 11

7 Canst thou by searching find out God? canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection?

8 It is as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know?

9 The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea.

“What canst thou do? What canst thou know?” – EXACTLY! Calvinists do not know what time is, what freewill is, what consciousness is, how God makes decisions with respect to time, etc… We know nothing. So, to shoe-horn determinism into God’s salvation is sick and foolish, especially when you consider the implications.

But never mind this, Calvinists don’t care for truth and would rather foolishly build for themselves a house on the sands of false assumptions, mockery, and the works of the hands of men. And when the day of Judgement comes, the waters thereof will wash them, and all of their works away. They are just like the Pharisees, whom Jesus hated. Not because he hated them from the foundation of the world, but because they were hypocrites that suppressed truth:

Luke 11

44 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them.

52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

Matthew 23

13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

I am telling you to dig past those things and build on the rock. Jesus Christ and what he did on the cross is that rock.

Romans 9

33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

2 Corinthians 10

4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

You do this by believing the gospel, in its essence, on its face value, without any preconceived or contrived notions that would undermine it’s plain meaning. You believe John 5:24 and just believe it. That’s all you have to do.

For the rest of this section, I will explain why hard determinism is an archaic, and foolish understanding of freewill, and God’s relationship to time.

Calvinists operate under a flawed and unsupported understanding of the nature of time. Nobody really knows what time is or how it works. We can measure the passing of time, but even the measure of time changes with respect to physical forces, like gravity. Relativity theory suggests that time itself dilates as a function of velocity.  Some scientists believe that space and time are inextricably linked. Some B-theorists of time think that the flow of time is an illusion and that past, present, and future events all exist simultaneously. And that the universe could be some 4-dimensional block of space-time. A-theory of time is more of a traditionalist view of time, where temporal becoming is real. Whatever the reality is, the point is that nobody really knows what time is.

And there is nothing in scripture that can give you grounds to make any hard or fast assumptions on the nature of time. Calvinism requires a fated\deterministic understanding of time. This assumption cannot be substantiated by science, nor by scripture. Instead of allowing the gospel and sound science\logic to determine our notion of freewill and time, Calvinism just alleges hard determinism (for no good reason). And they pervert the gospel to reflect this archaic, linear notion of time. They do this, because they think it is wise, and deep, and that it is the “meat of the word.”

Calvinists love to claim that their belief is correct, that it is scriptural, and that their cult is completely biblical. Yet they scream “Sovereign! Sovereign!” A word that is not found at all in the Bible. What’s funny is that famous Calvinistic debaters are quoted as saying, “freewill is not found anywhere in the Bible… anywhere!” (They tend to shift their eyes from side to side as they say this, hoping that nobody does a simple Google search to falsify their claim). Because Freewill is in the Bible, and the word they love, “sovereign” is not.

Deuteronomy 16

10 And thou shalt keep the feast of weeks unto the LORD thy God with a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand, which thou shalt give unto the LORD thy God, according as the LORD thy God hath blessed thee

There’s a bunch of other quotes (16 more) all of which refer to a freewill offering to God. Jesus Christ is the freewill offering that we give to God. Faith in Jesus Christ is the freewill offering. Just like Abel’s freewill offering in Genesis, which is a shadow of Christ.

Any time you hear the word “sovereign,” that is a dead giveaway that you are about to hear a bunch of Calvinistic flimflamming.

And in keeping with Calvinism’s abuse of language, sovereignty really means “meticulous control” to Calvinists. They think that God is in control of literally everything. They think that they are doing God service by holding fast to the idea that God literally ordains and controls every event that has ever happened. Including sin! This from Calvin’s institutes:

John Calvin: “For the man who honestly and soberly reflects on these things, there can be no doubt that the will of God is the chief and principal cause of all things.” (Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God, pg.177)

John Calvin: “Hence we maintain, that by his providence, not heaven and earth and inanimate creatures only, but also the counsels and wills of men are so governed as to move exactly in the course which he has destined. What, then, you will say, does nothing happen fortuitously, nothing contingently? I answer, it was a true saying of Basil the Great, that Fortune and Chance are heathen terms; the meaning of which ought not to occupy pious minds. For if all success is blessing from God, and calamity and adversity are his curse, there is no place left in human affairs for fortune and chance.” (The World, Created by God, Still Cherished and Protected by Him. Each and All of Its Parts Governed by His Providence, pg.180)

What does God have to say on this matter?

Ecclesiastes 9

11 I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.

I guess you would have to call God a heathen for allowing the word “chance” to enter into his mind. I guess God isn’t as pious as John Calvin, allowing such a thing to be written in the Bible. Oh, wait… according to Calvin, God decreed by his providence that this word should be in his Bible. I guess God likes to shoot himself in the foot, from time to time…It’s clear that Calvin didn’t give a damn about truth, nor the Bible. It is clear that he did not read the Bible. He just twisted the Bible. Because if he had read the Bible, he would not have made a fool of himself, by saying that “chance” is not a word that God would use, when it is used in the Bible. Calvin is a dumb, illiterate fool.

If only Calvin had the foreknowledge (see what I did there?) to know that search engines would exist in the future. Because if he had, he would have been careful not to say something as stupid as, “chance is a heathen term.” Because his whole theology is shut down by a simple 5 second word search in the Bible.

Calvin also thinks that God does not merely allow for sin, but rather that he dreams it up and decrees it.

John Calvin: “But it is quite frivolous refuge to say that God otiosely permits them, when Scripture shows Him not only willing but the author of them.” (Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God, pg.176)

John Calvin: “We also note that we should consider the creation of the world so that we may realize that everything is subject to God and ruled by his will and that when the world has done what it may, nothing happens other than what God decrees.” (Acts: Calvin, The Crossway Classic Commentaries, pg.66)

The reality is that God decided to create moral agents, free creatures that can choose to do A or B. God, in his omniscience, knew all these things would be, yet decided to create anyways. Clearly, God thought it a worthwhile cause. God created the world, because he is good and wants to create creatures that would freely love him back.

You don’t have to subscribe to any kind of notion of time, or God’s relationship to time. Because those things are beyond us. God condescended knowledge of himself and presented himself in a manner that we can understand. He tells us to believe. Therefore, believe! Do not come with a list of excuses like, “I can’t believe, unless I am preordained!” or “can a dead body believe?!” or “only the sovereignty of god, can make me believe!” These are just foolish claims to wisdom that man does not have. This is exactly what the parable of God’s wedding is about:

Luke 14

16 Then said he unto him, A certain man made a great supper, and bade many:

17 And sent his servant at supper time to say to them that were bidden, Come; for all things are now ready.

18 And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.

19 And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused.

20 And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.

21 So that servant came, and shewed his lord these things. Then the master of the house being angry said to his servant, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, and the maimed, and the halt, and the blind.

22 And the servant said, Lord, it is done as thou hast commanded, and yet there is room.

23 And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled.

24 For I say unto you, That none of those men which were bidden shall taste of my supper.

They all made all kinds of excuses. And this parable is not about excuses to get out of doing work. No, they were not asked to do work. They were asked to have dinner. But they all made lousy, stupid excuses. That is Calvinism. If you want to attend Christ’s supper, you have to believe. If you think that God forced you to believe, then that is your excuse. You will not taste of his supper.

This parable speaks expressly against Calvinism, because God is trying to compel the poor, the blind, the halt, the people in the highways and hedges, everyone to come. God bids everyone to come. Calvinism claims that God has not bid everyone, but unconditionally bids only his sheep to come.

Calvinism is such a blind cult. People of Calvin are enemies of Christ. They are antichrist. Still, God says, “All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people” (Romans 10:21). Calvinist, you are blind. God bids the blind. Therefore, repent from your devil Calvin, and believe in Jesus Christ. While there is time in your life, while you are alive. 1 John 2:2

Anyways, I am done disemboweling the U in TULIP. Unconditional election. I hope you can see that this is yet another point that is not founded on scripture. It is completely heretical and fallacious. It is built on a bunch of false assumptions, which God hath before warned us about. Do not be a Calvinist. Do not build your house on sand.

L. Limited atonement

Limited atonement is the easiest reformed doctrine to refute, as there are clear and explicit scriptures (not parables, nor proverbs) but plain speech that state the complete opposite.

Which is: Christ did, in fact, pay for the sins of the whole world. That he accomplished an unlimited atonement, made available to anyone who wants to believe.

Instead, limited atonement of Calvin states that Jesus did not pay for the sins of the whole world, but rather that he onlypaid for the sins of “his people.” I will quote R. C. Sproul’s own mouth (leading Calvinist) as he makes his best case for this retarded view of the cross:

R. C. Sproul: “I prefer not to use the term limited atonement because it is misleading. I rather speak of definite redemption or definite atonement, which communicates that God the Father designed the work of redemption specifically with a view to providing salvation for the elect, and that Christ died for His sheep and laid down His life for those the Father had given to Him” (

And in keeping with Calvinism’s slitherous approach, he refuses to give a straight answer. Instead, he uses many words and “fair sounding speech” to euphemize the obvious implications of his heresy. Key phrases like “definite redemption” or “definite atonement” are weak attempts to implant positive associations with Calvinism’s doctrine of: Christ’s not paying for everyone’s sins.

Limited atonement teaches that Christ is not the savior of the whole world. He thinks that he can smuggle in this heresy by softening the initial blow, with softer sounding words. This reminds me of what is written in the Bible, when the people of Israel did not want the truth, instead they wanted to hear “smooth things”:

Isaiah 30

10 Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:

Romans 16

17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.

18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speechesdeceive the hearts of the simple.

Colossians 2

8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Jude 1

4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

2 Peter 2

1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

18 For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.

The passage from 2 Peter (above) is very revealing. It tells of how certain men crept in unawares. “Crept in unawares,” which is exactly how Calvinism operates, with their willingness to befriend the simple, in hopes of later indoctrinating them. They creep in with their subtlety, and great swelling words of vanity. They come with their mild mannerisms, tame look, clean-cut appearance, with their degrees in theology, and oh how they love to play word games. I am talking semantics, not scrabble, though they would love to enter your home for a board game. They come with their subtlety to bring in damnable heresies: even denying the Lord that bought them! So, whoever these men are that Peter warns about, they deny Christ “who bought them.” Therefore, there are men whom Christ purchased with his own blood, that are condemned because of their twisting of scripture and denial of Christ. This is impossible if limited atonement were true, because God only bought his own people, according to Calvin. Therefore, this passage speaks expressly about Calvinism, in a very prophetic manner I might add.

As I was researching the origins of this limited atonement, it seems as though Calvin himself did not hold to this doctrine. Or at least he did not explicitly and succinctly draw any lines on this matter. Instead, what I find is that the Calvinists, in their pseudo-intellectual fervor, have come to the conclusion of limited atonement on the basis of deductive reasoning. Which sounds all fair and good, except their premises are all wrong. Calvinists are not committed to truth, but to their doctrine. Therefore, they are blind to the error in the preceding TU of their acrostic TULIP. In any case, as much as I hate Calvin, I must admit that he himself seemed to believe that Jesus Christ tasted death for the whole “human race.” But I cannot be sure what he means by this, as you know the manner of Calvinists. They use words that they ought not, to intentionally imply falsehoods, with the intent to later seduce you with their sick statement of faith. This is the definition of a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

What you will hear on this point is that “Christ died for all men without distinction, but not for all men without exception.” Which is another one of their cultish slogans they are likely to throw in your face. Which means that whenever the Bible says that God “died for the whole world,” or “whosoever,” it really means for any race, for any kind of human being.

Calvinists are really showing their true colors now! Whenever the Bible is read by a Calvinist, they do so with the backdrop of racial bigotry and exclusionism. And so, the great message of the Calvinist god has is that he died for all kindsof people.

My sarcastic response – Oh what Grace! You mean he didn’t die for everyman, as the Bible says? Instead, he only died for every kind of man?

Genuine Calvinist answer – isn’t it beautiful? What a great message, right? Not everyone can be saved, Oh the depths of God! Oh the love of God, shown towards the elect! The elect might be from any race! What a gift!

Clearly, the Calvin lover that came up with this defense must have struggled with some kind of prejudice or racial bigotry. And when the devil pointed that out, he thought it was the Holy Spirit guiding him into all truth. And then the ah hah moment came: “I must deny myself” thought the Calvinist.

… think, Calvinist think… what would Calvin do?…. It must be that god might elect some of those colored folks as well! As much as I hate to admit it! I was wrong to assume that God foreordained that the saved would be born white, that is wrong! I must deny myself. I must accept the possibility that God picks men from any race! That’s the grace of God! Of Course!

Only someone who is thoroughly brainwashed would accept this as a defensible position. God couldn’t care less about anyone’s race. Why? Because he made everyone. He could “of these stones raise up children unto Abraham” (Matthew 3:9). Which is literally what happened if you believe in theistic evolution, by the way. The Bible says, “For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?” (1 Corinthians 4:7). The Bible says that God does not respect any man’s person (Romans 2:11). Let alone race. Please, any retard would know this.

So, I will leave it at that for the heretical position. This limited atonement is so feeble, that it doesn’t even get off the ground.

I will now list some of the verses in the Bible about the unlimited atonement that God has made available to every single human being. It could have been that all are saved, but some choose not to be saved. That’s on them, that’s their choice.

1 John 2

2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

Colossians 1

28 Whom we preach, warning every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus

John 1

9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

Hebrews 7

9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

John 3

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 11

26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

Acts 2

11 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Romans 10

13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

1 John 1

9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

Revelation 22

17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

John 5

9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.

10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son

11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.

12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

John 4

And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.

Timothy 4

10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

1 John 4

4 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.

These scriptures speak for themselves. Not only that, but there are no explicit scriptures that Calvinists may appeal to, in order to say that God did not pay for the sins of the whole world. They do not have a single verse that says, “Jesus Christ did not taste death for everyman.” But we do have a scripture that says, “he by the grace of God should taste death for every man” (Hebrews 2:9).

Any Calvinist reading this, I challenge you: give me 1 verse that says the following:

  1. Jesus Christ did NOT taste death for every man.
  2. Jesus Christ is NOT the savior of the whole world.
  3. Jesus Christ is NOT the propitiation for the sins of the whole world.
  4. God so loved the elect, that only the elect may believe and be saved.
  5. The Spirit and the bride say come, who whosoever is elect, let him come. And whosoever is forced, force him to take of the water of life forcefully.

Please, Calvinist, provide me with explicit scriptures that say any one of the above statements. Waiting…

Calvinists will give account for their blasphemy. God will ask them: “Why should I pick you over someone else?” Calvinists have no response, because their own doctrine says that they are unconditionally elected. God’s response: “Therefore, neither will I pick you.”

Calvinism is a trap. The devil is setting up Calvinists to be denied Heaven when they die. The devil hates everyone, including his own. That’s why the devil is tricking Calvinists, he is setting them up for Hell, on the day of judgement.

Limited atonement is completely unscriptural. Salvation is extended to every single human being that has ever lived, or ever will live.

In Jesus name,


I. Irresistible Grace

Irresistible grace is the idea that once God unconditionally elects someone, that person is given irresistible grace. Which means that a person could not have rejected the call to salvation. God draws them in, and they are incapable of resisting.

I do not understand why Calvinists believe this. There is no reason for this to be true, other than to further shoe-horn-in hard determinism and fatalism into their religion. Which is to say that God has meticulous control over everything, including sins and salvation. This idea is completely preposterous and alien to the scriptures. Only in the vain writings of Calvin would you see this kind of thing espoused.

With that said, I will present a few scriptures that clearly show people resisting God’s grace. Because, as I have said, people have the freedom to believe or to not believe. There are no strings attached, and no “irresistible grace” to speak of.

Acts 7

51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.

This verse alone proves that a man is able to resist the Holy Ghost. But I will quote even more.

Deuteronomy 10

16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked.

17 For the Lord your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:

18 He doth execute the judgment of the fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger, in giving him food and raiment.

19 Love ye therefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Before I break down this passage, I want to point out how Calvinists, and a lot of people in Christianity, would go about striving over vain words. Like they would read this passage out of Deuteronomy and say, this is different from God’s election in Christ. Really? Can we not understand God’s character from the passage above? God chose Israel to bring forth the Lord Jesus Christ. God protected the nation in order to ensure that Christ would come into the world and pay for the sins of everyman. It was never about partiality, racism, or nationality. It was always about keeping God’s promise to Abraham, that the whole world would be blessed through him.

Why Abraham? Because he believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness.

But no… Calvinists would rather go to the Greek, the Hebrew, to Calvin, to Spurgeon, to any means to deny God’s goodness. Jesus Christ says that they “strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel” (Matthew 23:24). They deny the very heart of God, Jesus Christ, by their wordplay and semantics.

For example, John 3:36 says, “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.” A normal person would read this and see that anyone can believe and be saved, and anyone who does not is damned. But not Calvinists. When Calvinists read this, they see it as “those whom God irresistibly draws are saved.” And they will do all manner of literary gymnastics to force their doctrine into the text. If we are to really split hairs on this matter, then according to John 3:36, only men are saved and not women. Why? Because it says, “He that believeth on the son hath everlasting life.” It does not say “she.” Therefore, we conclude that women cannot have everlasting life.

…You see how retarded the traditions of Calvin are. Calvinists search the scriptures, actually they don’t. They search the writings of Calvin and they refuse to believe on Jesus Christ. They will do anything to prove their doctrine right, including going to Hell. Because some Calvinists will go to Hell for having never believed on the real Jesus Christ.

John 5

38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.

39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.

Anyways, getting back to the text of Deuteronomy. The point of that passage is that Israel is an allegory of the “elect” in that they are chosen of God. But what is God’s attitude towards the “unelect?” People outside of Israel? He loves them. He loves the stranger, the unchosen. That is why God, “regardeth not man.” And “executeth Judgement for the widow and the orphan.” Why them? Because they are helpless. God does not leave the helpless defenseless. Calvinism teaches that God does not defend the helpless. God overlooks the vast sea of people who cannot believe on him. This is alien to God’s character. God will not unilaterally regenerate one person, and not another. If he did, he would do it for everyone equally. And to top it all off, God told Israel not to be “stiff-necked,” he is telling them to align their will with his own. This statement is meaningless under Calvinism. This whole passage in Deuteronomy is a testimony against Calvinism and irresistible grace.

Another passage about man’s will thwarting God’s will (because God willingly respects man’s will) is when Christ stood over Jerusalem and mourned over their unwillingness to believe.

Matthew 23

37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Another example of someone resisting the grace of God is Judas.

John 6

70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

71 He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve.

Clearly, God picked Judas. But Judas refused to believe on Christ. He was unbelieving and betrayed Christ. Christ said he picked the 12. Jesus loved Judas, but Judas would not believe in the love of Christ, which is why he killed himself. Because had he believed in the forgiveness of God, he would have had hope, and would not have killed himself. But lo, God’s grace is resistible, hence Judas’ self-inflicted demise by way of resisting the grace of God.

There are many more examples about people not doing what God would have them do. In fact, the entire Bible, the whole history of mankind, is one of resisting God’s will. There are countless examples of God’s chosen people being stiff-necked, resisting his provision and grace. Irresistible grace is completely untenable and foreign to the scriptures, as are all of the points of Calvinism.

P. Perseverance of the Saints

Here is a good summary of Calvinism’s perseverance of the saints:

“The doctrine of the perseverance of the saints does not maintain that all those who profess the Christian faith are certain of heaven. It is saints – those who are set apart by the Spirit – who persevere to the end. It is believers – those who are given true, living faith in Christ – who are secure and safe in Him. Many who profess to believe fall away, but they do not fall from grace for they were never in grace. True believers do fall into temptations, and they do commit grievous sins, but these sins do not cause them to lose their salvation or separate them from Christ” (Louis Berkhof from Systematic Theology, pg.546)

This last point does not enrage me as all the others, as this is a common problem that many Christians deal with. And that is of assurance. You see, many denominations feel as though there must be significant change in the believer’s conduct and daily life in order to validate their faith. This is nothing short of works. The P in TULIP is works-based theology, which is completely wrong.

What is hypocritical about Calvinism’s version of works is that it completely denies the assurance a believer may have in God’s grace. Because it says, “Many who profess to believe fall away, but they do not fall from grace for they were never in grace.” What this means is that you really do not know if you are in grace or not. You cannot tell. Because you can be utterly deceived, your whole life, until you one day become guilty of a heinous act. That act proves that you are not persevering, and therefore you were never saved to begin with.

I sort of laugh at this. Because this really gets to the heart of Calvinism. Calvinism and reformed theology touts itself as being a doctrine of grace, a denomination that is completely opposed to works. And they love to debate other denominations on this point, yet they themselves are ensnared under the same system of works. Calvinists will snark and snap at works based salvation, but are happy to include works as evidence of salvation. Why? It’s because they do not really care about the morality or truth behind it all, they only care about harmonizing Calvin with scripture. So, they are fine with works, so long as it does not step on the toes of their little “g” god Calvin. They really do not care about whether they can perform the works, or not. They do not really care about God’s perfection that cannot accept man’s works. This is hypocrisy at its finest.

Because if perseverance in good works is proof of salvation, then you cannot know that you are saved. Especially since Calvinists believe everyone to be totally incapable of believing, and that God unconditionally picks some over others. And especially since God only died for some people and not all people, and those who he died for, he unilaterally gives salvation to. Because of all these preceding points, it is impossible to have confidence in salvation, it is impossible to have confidence in Christ.

Therefore, Calvinists do not have assurance of salvation, they must continue to do good works to prove to themselves that they are saved. Yet there is always the possibility that they would fall away at the last second. And if they do, that would prove that their salvation was never there.

Therefore, the only way for a Calvinist to be sure that he is saved, is to have unyielding confidence in his own performance. His confidence rests in his flesh, and bodily works, which constantly come short of the glory of God.

That is why Calvinists are usually high-minded narcissists, that love themselves. You would have to be, if you believe that your good works prove that God is in you.

The truth is that there are no good works that could prove anything. Nobody is good enough to attain salvation, let alone persevere in it.

Luke 12

26 If ye then be not able to do that thing which is least, why take ye thought for the rest?

Luke 17

10 So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.

And what about Paul? He wrote most of the new testament. Surely, he would have good works. Surely, he would have signs of persevering in the faith. What does he have to say about himself?

1 Timothy 1

15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.

Oh, he must not be persevering. Where is his confidence? Is it in his works? No, it is in that “faithful saying” that Christ came to save sinners. I am a sinner; therefore, he came to save me. That is where the confidence is to be had. Not in perseverance of the saints. It is in the preservation of the savior.

Philipians 3

3 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe.

2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.

3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.

And finally, what is the evidence of our salvation? Christ. That he rose from the dead. He is our evidence of salvation.

John 20

27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.

28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.

29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

God is the proof of salvation, not the works of man. This problem of works is explained in much greater detail in other sections of this book\blog. Or read Galatians.


I hope that this has been a venom-filled and articulate evisceration of the doctrine of devils many call Calvinism. I pull no punches and want to make clear that Calvinism is not an in-house issue of Christianity. Calvinism is fundamentally opposed to all that is called good. Calvinism is the most perverse snare that the devil has laid out before us. It is so patently false, unscriptural, and so easily refuted that I truly do not understand how widely accepted it has become. There are many teachers, pastors of mega-churches, and even seminaries that teach this theology as though it were an acceptable interpretation of scripture. On the contrary, Calvinism spits on God, calls God a liar, makes a mockery of the Bible, turning the entire narrative of scripture on its head. God hates Calvinism with a white-hot hatred. They make God the author of evil, and they say that it’s for his glory. Calvinists treat their doctrine as though it were the “strong meat” of the word. As though only elite\mature Christians, those that are intellectually superior, can stomach their teaching. As if faith is solely a matter of the mind.

Calvinism is a contest to see who can fashion for themselves the most abhorrent view of God, and then love it, and call it good. The more satanic\sadistic the idol they make, the more spiritual the Calvinist is. Do you know what God has to say about that? “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20). And they fancy themselves intellectuals, because they have been able to orchestrate some system of theology. As if their acronyms, flow charts, logic twisting, and gnat straining do God justice. As if their 20, 30, or even 40 years of theological study means anything to God. Even if there were a million reformed books out there, with a million years of reformed history, they are all counted for nothing. Why? Because God is infinite. “God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar” (Romans 3:4). If God were to condescend knowledge of himself, of his message, he would bring them all the way down to within reach of anyone. He would not condescend all the way down to within the grasp of man, but stop just shy of 30 years’ worth of study… please. Christ said, “Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18:3).

God made it easy for everyone, because God is good, and loves everyone. He is not evil. I can’t believe that statement has to be explicitly written down in this treatise on Calvinism, which is supposed to be a Christian denomination. Calvinism is of the devil, and I caution anyone who takes part in this twisted cult. Hell, even Satanists are better than Calvinists. Why? Because they have more truth in them than Calvinists do: at least Satanists know who they serve. I bet that the real reason why Calvin came up with this theology of meticulous control, is because of all his failed attempts to evangelize people. He must have shown his TULIP to people, only to be spat upon with disgust. And because he is blinded by his own self-aggrandizement, he could never find fault with his own theology. Then an idea struck in his mind,

“AH HA! only the chosen ones can accept God! That’s why they reject me!”

And so now we have his demonic doctrine, that appeals to narcissists and control freaks.

Never once did it cross his sick mind that God might actually be good, that He may actually love everyone, that He might actually respect man’s will. No, that’s not possible. Because that would mean Calvin was wrong. And we know Calvin is the elect of elects, and the little “g” god, Calvin could not possibly be wrong. And all throughout this weirdo’s life, it never dawned on him that he might have another Jesus, another gospel. Not even once I bet, as he beckoned the Geneva courts to burn Servetus (a physician) at the stake with green wood. Green wood, which is slow burning wood, to make the burning of that innocent man all the more agonizing. Why did Calvin order this? Because of some disagreement on the nature of the trinity, which Calvin himself did not understand. It wasn’t enough to sentence Servetus to death, but Calvin wanted him to suffer even more, to burn him at the stake with green wood. What a sick, illegitimate son of a bitch coward.

Calvin thought he was doing God service by killing Servetus. Only a weak, helpless god, such as the god of Calvin needs defending in this manner. Indeed, Christ said, “yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service” (John 16:2). Did Calvin ever once pick up a Bible? What was this man reading? How could he not see these things in the book? I swear, when you read Calvin’s writings, it is nothing but a bunch of double talking, flowery, opinionated garbage. Nothing he says makes sense. And those things that are exceptionally senseless, Calvinists say are a matter of the spirit; and that the natural man cannot receive the things of the spirit. Really?!! Which spirit? Please tell me.

Because nothing Calvin says comes from the Bible. Christ said that the words he speaks, they are spirit and they are life. So why do you let Calvin take the spirit of God, his words, and play semantics with them?! I spit on Calvin. There is nothing in the world that I hate more than Calvinism. I hope that is clear. Someone had to say it. There are too many cowardly and unbelieving Christians that are too fearful to say such things. They let themselves get bullied by these wordsmithing, lying, double talking, doubleminded, snakes of Hell. Most Christians are bullied into accepting the devil of Calvin, because they are afraid that God may actually be like that. Why don’t you read the Bible and search these things out yourself? Instead of allowing this idol of Calvin to deface the real God that you believe in? If you just read the book of John, Calvinism would have been irreparably destroyed by the 12th verse.

And I understand what all this sounds like. It sounds like an angry rant, from a disgruntled TULIP hater. And yes, that’s exactly what this is. I refuse to address Calvinism in a thorough, exegetical fashion. That would be far too charitable for Calvinism. Calvinism is not an intellectually stimulating doctrine, nor is it an honest exegesis of scripture. This doctrine does not even state its own assumptions as to what time is, God’s relationship to time, what free will is, what consciousness is; how God orders things with all of these variables in play. Calvinism is so retarded, so sloppy, so lousy, that I would be doing it service to address it on a verse by verse basis. I will not validate this cult by addressing it in that manner. The only reason why I spoke as much as I have on TULIP is because of how ubiquitous this teaching is. And it is so disgusting, so repugnant, that I have to destroy it. “For necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!” (1 Corinthians 9:16) Besides, Calvinism is a dishonest gnat straining, camel swallowing fest of death. They would look for a comma, a semi colon, a false assumption, anything, by any means, to deny God’s goodness. And even then, they are wrong in their exegesis.

If you want someone who would clearly address each of their twisting of verses, I would point you to Leighton Flowers. He has addressed these issues, in this manner, with his books. He is much kinder than I am, in this way. My purpose here is to just destroy the works of the devil, and to present the truth, in the most efficient way possible. I don’t have the time, nor the will to do battle with satan’s puppets. This is me quickly stepping on a cockroach. Leighton Flowers is like a professional exterminator, when it comes to Calvinism.

Again, one more time, let’s take a step back and look at the motives for Calvinism. What is the point of Calvinism? The only point in Calvinism is for Calvinists to prove that God did not pay for everyone’s sins. It’s to exalt some men over others. It’s to deny hope for some people. It’s to create doubt in the hearts of men. It’s to prove that Calvinists are smarter than you, because they have some kind of insight as to God’s ways. The point of Calvinism is to sow to the flesh of man. It’s to commend man’s wisdom, by revealing some hidden or counter-intuitive facet of God. The hope of Calvinism (and it’s a dead hope) is that Calvin knows the scriptures a little better than most.

Is that it? Is that what they want? That they may be regarded highly of men? “Verily I say unto you, They have their reward” (Matthew 6:5). And at what cost? At the cost of destroying the work of God. At the cost of denying some people entry into Heaven.

There are no redeeming qualities of Calvinism. There is nothing compelling about this pretentious, deformed, perverted cult. The only compelling thing about this doctrine, is the involuntary parasympathetic retching that happens as a result of hearing these things. It is completely vain, illogical, unscriptural, ungodly, and evil to the core. Disgusting. If there was ever a person who actually deserves to burn in Hell, it’s John Calvin.

I will close out of this section by saying that the only hope for a Calvinist is if they were saved before they had ever entered this cult. The best-case scenario for a Calvinist is that they were saved long ago. And that they had later wasted their entire lives, living out a false religion, worshiping the devil. That’s the base case scenario. Of course, Hell is the other (more likely) outcome.

If you are a Calvinist, I suggest you stop blaspheming God. Repent ye, and believe the gospel.

John 5:24

In Jesus name,



Please follow and like us:


  • Calvinist hate me because I expose them and don’t give them room to argue. I am sick of them and see a lot of people falling into this garbage,especially young people. I tell them that if they misrepresent my God that they have cursed their selves and they are helbound. I even had a person tell me that reformed people are good folk and it’s just a matter of semantics. I have lost my respect for this punk that thinks he is intelligent. I am fighting mad over this! They are more subtle than the church of Christ who I thought were the most argumentative ones.

  • Very helpful discourse that I in the main agree wholeheartedly with. However I do have to disagree with your belief in Eternal security which ironically is as wayward to scripture as Calvanism is. I always wondered why Sproul held such strange views. Here is bible verse to challenge your osas. Philippians 3 v 12. Of course Paul makes this point in many other places in his letters

    • Well if you want to disagree with Jesus,obviousely you would disagree with eternal security.We are kept by the power of God.
      To say. You can over come his keeping power smacks of self righteousness and pride.
      Read the gospel of John,tells you how one is born again,simply by believing Jesus is the Christ,the son of God and by believing we have eternal life.
      We have been made a child of God a new creation,transferred from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of the light of Christ.We are already seated in Christ at the right hand of the father in heavenly places.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

Follow by Email